International regulations to prevent and minimize pollution from ships came into effect in the early 1970s in response to several major oil spills. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted a set of rules under the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL). Since then, it has been expanded to include noxious liquid substances, harmful materials carried in package form, sewage, garbage, and air pollution.
Many of these rules have been incorporated into national regulations and laws. In Canada, most aspects of MARPOL have been adopted under the Canada Shipping Act, 2001. In addition, the International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code), developed by the IMO, has been incorporated into Canada’s Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act (AWPPA). To compare, some
Canadian regulations such as those for sewage discharge are stricter than MARPOL.
While the two countries work together in shared waters, there are some differences between the U.S. and Canada, notably in the Great Lakes region.
In general, Canada and the U.S. try to coordinate actions under the
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement for joint emergency pollution response and work together on
ballast water management in the Great Lakes. However, the two countries are not in agreement for new ballast water rules taking effect in 2024 and requiring vessels of at least 400 gross tonnes to be equipped with a ballast water management system. The U.S., which has not ratified the IMO’s International
Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments and has exempted its fleet of commercial vessels operating on the Great Lakes from having to install onboard ballast water management systems, believes that this rule should not be applied to ships that only use the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River region. Conversely, Canada has ratified the Convention, and says ships must have onboard systems. Both countries are in negotiations to resolve the matter.
When the two nations are parties to the same conventions, they do not necessarily apply the same standards because some conventions provide a minimum requirement and some American states may regulate higher standards or adopt their own standards, as in the case of California regarding ballast water management.
For example, the U.S. is not a signatory to MARPOL IV (regulations on sewage) but they have
equivalent laws to protect against pollution from sewage, found in the Section 312 of the Clean Water Act.